requestId:68499ab3ca24c2.04813049.
Story interpretation and school relationship——Rethinking of the Confucius Association in “Historical Records”
Author: Li Wei (speaker of the Department of Philosophy in Zhongshan)
Source: “Philosophy Dynamics” 2017 Issue 7
Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou Xuanyue on Wushen
Jesus November 17, 2017
Abstract:Seeing the “Confucius was suitable for Zhou and would give him a gift to Lao Tzu” in “Historical Records”. In earlier articles, they were talked about as two stories. One was that Confucius visited Zhou to give a gift, but he did not talk to Lao Tzu; the other was that Confucius visited Lao Tzu, but he was not a talk. The narrative in “Historical Records” is very likely due to the integration of the above two story materials by the Taoist system, and this is related to the change of the Confucian and Taoist relationship from the “internal and external” format to the “six schools” format in the pre-Qin and Qin and Han periods.
Keywords: Confucius, Laozi, “Historical Records”, “Quotes”, “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” “Confucius,” said in history, “The Records of History”, “Quotes of Laozi” (hereinafter referred to as “The Records of Laozi””). There are many questions about history. But when you read the story, there are also places worthy of serious thinking. For example, Lao Tzu, who advocated “the husband is the leader of loyalty and trustworthiness” (Chapter 38 of “Character and Morality”, is called the object of “a gift”, which makes people surprised. [1] However, due to the limitations of historical materials, it is difficult to make a judgment. Therefore, to explain why Confucius “questioned Laozi”, he could only advance from the Confucian and Taoist relations, that is, the story of “question” presented in “Shi Ji”, as a description of Sima’s “ignoring the whole country to let go of old news” (“Shi Ji·Preface to Tai Shi Gong”), it is definitely not only a personal creation, but also a product that Confucian and Taoist corresponds to. Compared with the story of Confucius teaching Laozi in “Travels: Zengzi’s Questions”, written by Confucians, the story of “Travels” that is believed to be “Travels” from Taoism (and can be directly derived from “Zangzi” [2]). Because the account of “Zeng Zi’s question Baoqing Club”, as Tsuda Yasuki said, “it was “to teach Laozi to Confucius in this way”; [3] But “Laozi’s Propaganda” clearly showsIt expresses the direction of what Kong or Ban Gu said, “Beginning with old age and then Six Secrets” (“Han Book·Sma’s Province”). However, this “question” story from Taoist genres is finally presented, and it cannot be simply regarded as a way to lower Confucianism, so it is necessary to engrave the abstract of Confucius and Lao Tzu. Because in “Zangzi”, Confucius and the participants answered the questions, and then made a comment on their answers. The disciple’s abstraction has long been described vividly, but what I see in this is mostly about talking about it, nor is it in Zhou. [4] This means that “Confucius was well-behaved and would give a greeting to Laozi” became the material and emotion for the story of Confucius and Laos in Taoism, and there must be some special reason. By exploring the discussion, we can not only see how the “Quotation” story of “History Records” is composed, but also see the format and changes of the late Confucian and Taoist relationship.
1. “Friendly Ask” and “Seeing Laozi”
Although Laozi has become the target of “Quotation”, it is difficult to see from “Laozi’s Translation”. However, “Confucius’s Family Words·Watching Zhou” provides a very important supplement, which is what it says: Confucius said to Jingshu of Nangong, “I heard that Laozi was well-known to the past and knew the present, understood the essence of honor, and understood the virtues, and was my teacher. Now I will go.” Laozi was described as a versatile authority, but Confucius 手机app‘s gift to him is just. However, according to the following description in “The View of Zhou”, Nangong Jingshu asked King Lu Zhao on behalf of Confucius to enter Zhou Dynasty:
Now Confucius will be suitable for Zhou, observe the rules of the previous kings, and examine the great things of the ceremony. Is this great cause? Please go and go.
This makes people wonder. When Confucius came to Zhou Bi, he actually went for Laozi, or for the inheritance of the previous kings, especially the Duke of Zhou? Maybe it can be said that “the rule of the previous kings” is as far as Lao Tzu “who knows the present” is “out of ancient times and knowledge of the present”, so there is no difference. But in fact, from the following article of “Watching Zhou”, asking Lao Tzu is just a small part of Confucius’ clear about the mandate of the previous kings (see below). In addition, even if the former kings were in control of the rules, it was surprising that such a major figure would never be mentioned in the formal remarks that Jing Shu of Nangong asked King Zhao. And this doubt can actually be found in the narrative of “Historical Records”: Confucius was suitable for his work and would give him a greeting. (“Laozi’s Protest”)
Full weekly greetings and see Laozi. (“The Family of Confucius”)
It is not difficult to see that the account in “The Legend of Laozi” is very clear, and Confucius just went for Laozi; but in “The Family of Confucius”, Confucius’ “appropriate greetings” and “seeing Laozi” seem to be two of them口用成动成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成口用成� href=”https://twsweetsugar99.org/”>The amount of money for the maintenance does not have the clear connection in “Laozi’s Protest”.
In fact, Confucius’ “question” and “seeing Laozi” were told as two stories in late literature. It is like “Zizhe went to the big house and asked every matter.” …It is a gift.” The “Confucius’s Zhou Viewing Big House” in the chapter 46 of the Fuyang Double Ancient Dui, and the story of Confucius entering Zhou and visiting Tai Si in “Shiyuan Keshen” do not touch Lao Tzu; on the other hand, the conversations of Confucius in “Zhuangzi” are mostly not in Zhou, and they do not talk about gifts. So, “Confucius’s Zhou is suitable for Zhou in “Laozi” , will the question be presented to Laozi, can it be regarded as a story that integrates two story materials and integrates them? Judging from the “Family Questions and See Laozi” in “The Family of Confucius” and the major texts of “Watching the Zhou Dynasty”, this can exist, especially according to the latter’s description of Confucius’ process:
The two horses of Confucius were served in the same carriage and the two horses served in the imperial court, and they respected Shu and all went to Zhou. [1] He presented to Lao Dan, [2] visited the place of the suburbs and society, [4] examined the Mingtang, and observed the magistrates of the dynasty. So he sighed and said, “I know the saints of Zhou Gong and the reason why Zhou was king. “
“Quest to Lao Dan” Although Confucius explored the first process of “the sage of Zhou Gong and the reason why Zhou Wang”, its important process ([2]-[4]) was nothing to do with Lao Tzu. In other words, Confucius’ clearness of Zhou Gong’s regime came not only from Lao Tzu, but also from Lao Tzu. Then the so-called “question” story is very similar to the two materials of “visiting Lao Tzu and visiting Zhou Gong”.
The problem is, Instinct does not touch Lao Tzu’s “appropriate gifts”, but it finally means “appropriate gifts to Lao Tzu”. How is this plot designed? The story is a virtual structure, but the virtual structure is not created, but is often based on an older story as the blue book. So if the narrative in “Lao Tzu” is really a story that is made up of Confucius’ “appropriate gifts” and “see Lao Tzu” girl raised her head and real
發佈留言